-- 20110103E-Politi-anmeldelse-fra-RLH.html    --- BREVENE ( intern ) --- Politi-anmeldelsene-Index.html ( intern ) ---  dbn.html ( ekstern ) ---

The translation of this document from Norwegian to English is perr 10.02. 2011 not entirely completed yet! Still on the way.
((( norske original-versjon er på denne linken: intern - ekstern )))

RLH: Sent by e-mail 04.01. 2011.    



To:
Haugaland og Sunnhordland politidistrikt,
pr. e-post: post.haugalandogsunnhordland@politiet.no
-- and copy to:
Politimesteren i Rogaland, Rogaland politidistrikt, e-post-adresse post.rogaland@politiet.no 

From:
Rune Leander Hansen,
5568 Vikebygd
Dato: Monday 03. January 2011, Tindeland.                               

Police-report - House inquisition, and more

   Five people, including three police officers and two from the local child care services in Haugesund, did house-inquisition here in our home 24.12. 2010, Christmas Eve. These five human beings or/and single human beings within and under the public authorities they work for has since 2006 kept my family and me under harassment, terror and torture.

   
They are not the only criminals involved in this injustice, which I'll tell including on about, and also refers to my filed police report dated 02.02.2010, Case No.11059001 delivered to Haugaland and Sunnhordland Police (followed up with further documentation)
This filed report was dismissed, which through an e-mail was written and properly appealed to the police and Sunnhordland Haugaland 05/27/2010 (case number 20100527-Complaint on dropping of charges)
The complaint on the shelving of the case has not yet answered. Of the filed police report indicated the scope of what matter in the whole, it is all about. Which I also hereunder shall give an outline of.
   An effective and fair treatment of the filed police report could have prevented the worst of the crime had been consummated.
During the course of this I had a variety of ways disqualified Arild Austin, an employee of Ølen - Vindafjord sheriff's office's involvement with the case complex. Had this been stopped or avoided as could perhaps also be further development of the criminals, and the consummation of the crime have been prevented and stopped at an early stage. He has, therefore, in different ways been involved and an accomplice in the crime.
   The present police-review is thus a kind of addition and continuation of the aforementioned. And I desire continued and even now that those in this complex matter that has violated applicable law and punishable under the law, and I crave the restoration and compensation on behalf of the children, myself, my family and all affected by this injustice.

   During house-Inquisition, I was under threats compelled to give a DNA sample, and I pointed to my still unanswered letters sent by e-mail to police regarding this 08.11.2010 (Case No. 20101108-to-police-from-RLH -about-DNA).
   My protests were therefore neither been accepted or answered. For some, perhaps a trifle in this context, but for me important enough.
As just one example of some of this, the following words from my diary notes for 31.12. 2010: "The police house-inquisition and DNA retrieval from Christmas Eve my body makes me less keen to move me. Not that I'm paranoid, but I know and have widely experienced what they are doing."
   The reason I mention this here now is that I also crave criminal responsibility, restitution and compensation in relation to this, too.
   For example, in relation to the front door here that the police destroyed, as those with physical force broke into the house during its action. A trifle in itself in an economic context in relation to the great values this case complex, all in all is all about. But of considerable importance to me and others. Acute, because such an unsolved problem is hard for me to solve under the prevailing conditions and may involve further and far more serious consequences.


   This complex case has been going on for a long time and thus contains many isolated small and large elements and aspects. And more and worse consequences take place before the restoration and replacement.

   I wrote in my diary, 24.12. 2010, Christmas Eve, after the house-inquisition the following:
   Stauda came home yesterday, happy and satisfied.
   Today at 11 am three police-men, along with two women from the CPS in Haugesund with force entered our home. They broke the door lock on your front door in a house-inquisition. A burglary and intrusion in our house, which lasted slightly more than two hours.
   They forced me with threats to a DNA test sample from my body. And further forced Stauda with them - clearly against her will.
   It's all a huge and multiple rape, almost all word meanings. One of these individuals was Gerd Liljan Hegerland.
   At least two police cars and a civilian car was directly involved in the operation. They did not even know if Stauda was here, or if anyone at all was at home when they intruded.
   Everything that happened was audio recorded from my side.
   This is now approximate the ninth time since April 2008 that Stauda is kidnapped and held prisoner. She was not even allowed to take her clothes with her.
   The house is still ice cold after they were here ...
   Many of them pretend that they do not know or understand the perverse madness they perform. but everything suggests that they do.
Audio recording, I am sure, however, is of great interest to many. Norway 2010.
   As usual, she had a thousand things to do when she got home, effortlessly and naturally. The puppies, walking our dog Mickey, caring for her hamster, clean and organize her belongings, talk about the different things, etc...
   However, there was little we had the opportunity to talk about, or she had done before they again came and violated and raped her life and her mind.

   A gross violation and crime not only against Stauda, but also me, her father.
   I have reason to assert that for these five people is concerned, all or some of them. Plus accomplices in their employment agency, with and into this crime - is also about crimes against the following general over-current Norwegian law provisions:



   Human Rights Act, Appendix 2, ECHR, Article 1 ((
Menneskerettsloven Vedlegg 2, EMK, Art 1)):
   "Obligation to respect human rights / The High Contracting Parties shall secure to everyone within their jurisdiction the rights and freedoms defined in Section I of this Convention."

   Human Rights Act, Appendix 2, ECHR, Article 3 ((Menneskerettslovens Vedlegg 2, EMK, Art 3)):  
   "Prohibition of torture / No one shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment."

   Torture-clause of the Norwegian General Sivil Penal Code 11. chapter, § 110-126, on "Crime in the public service" -
   The Norwegian General Sivil Penal Code § 117a:
   "Those who commit torture shall be punished by imprisonment of up to 15 years. In case of rough and severely tortured to death, imprisonment up to 21 years imposed. Those taking part is punishable in the same way. / With torture meant that a public official cause another person harm or serious physical or mental pain, /  a)   with the intention to obtain information or a confession, /  b) with the intention to punish, threaten, or coerce anyone, or /  c) because of the person's creed, race, color, gender, homosexual orientation, lifestyle or orientation or national or ethnic origin.
   In this provision public official means anyone who /  a) exercise public authority on behalf of the state or municipality, or /  b)  performs services or work as a state or municipality pursuant to law or regulation shall appoint someone to perform or fully or partially pay for.
   It is also regarded as torture that the actions referred to in subsection are committed by a person acting at the request or with the express or implied consent from a public official. / Added by Act of June 25, 2004 No. 52 "
 
   And General Sivil Penal Code § 123:  
   "Misuse of an official servant's position on the enterprise or failure of the service action to violate anyone's right, he shall be punished by fines or loss of service, or with imprisonment of up to 1 year. / Has he acted in the purpose to acquire for himself or another a improper gain, or if with the crime considerable injury or
violation of rights has been wilful caused, imprisonment up to 5 years may be imposed. "

   And General Sivil Penal Code § 124:  
   "A Public Servants, which circuit unconstitutional use of its public position with the purpose or the story that persuaded some that do, speak, or refrain from something, punishable by fines or loss of service."

   
And General Sivil Penal Code § 125:  
  "A public servant who misleads or incites any official subordinate to him or under his supervision in the public service to commit a felony in this service, or who assists him therein or knowingly lets him commit such felony, or who abuses his office to incite another public servant to commit a felony in the public service or to assist him therein shall be liable to the same penalty as the latter. / Such penalty shall apply regardless of whether the other public servant is not criminally liable because of good faith or for any other reason."

   False documentation-clause in the norwegian General Sivil Penal Code 11. chapter,  § 110-126, on "Crime in the public service" -
   The Norwegian General Sivil Penal Code § 120:
 
   "If a public servant in any record pertaining to his office have made a false entry or conceals the truth, or if he in preparing of any official document, telegram or telephone message or in stamping, marking or any other official attestation, which is issued to serve as evidence, makes or attests any false statement or conceals the truth, he shall be liable to loss of office or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding three years, but not exceeding six years if he has acted for the purpose of obtaining for himself or another an improper gain or to injury anyone."

   And false statement-clause in the norwegian General Sivil Penal Code 18. chapter,  § 179-214, on "Document false" -
   The Norwegian General Sivil Penal Code § 189 and 190:
 
   "§ 189. Any person who in any Norwegian or foreign official document or book or in any medical certificate makes an incorrect statement concerning any event or circumstance, for which the statement is intended to serve as evidence, or who contribute to, such a statement to be made, or who aids and abets thereto, shall be liable to fines or imprisonment for a term not exceeding one year, but not exceeding 3 years if the intent was to obtain for himself or another an improper gain or to injury any person.
   § 190. Any person who uses as correct any such statement as is mentioned in section 189 shall be penalized as therein provided."

   And General Sivil Penal Code § 215:  
   "§ 215. Any person who with improper intent attempts to deprive another person of the family status to which he is entitled or to acquire for himself or another person a false family status, or who aids and abets thereto, shall be liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 6 years. If there are especially extenuating circumstances, fines may be imposed. / This provision shall not apply in determining paternity pursuant to the Children Act."

   And General Sivil Penal Code § 216:  
   "§ 216. Any person who causes a minor to be unlawfully deprived of or kept deprived of his parents' or other concerneds' care, or who aids and abets thereto, shall be liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 3 years. If there are extenuating circumstances, fines may be imposed. A public prosecution will only be instituted when requested by an aggrieved person."

   General Sivil Penal Code § 223 (in the acts chapter about "Crimes against personal liberty"), according to the law:  
   "§ 223. Any person who unlawfully deprives another person of his liberty or who aids and abets such deprivation of liberty, shall be liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 5 years. / If the deprivation of liberty has lasted for more than one month, or has caused any person abnormal suffering or considerable injury to body or health or has resulted in the death of anyone, imprisonment for a term of not less than one year shall be imposed. / Anyone who conspires with anyone about to commit an act referred to in the second section shall be liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 10 years."

   That 1 month according to the law in § 223, are a crass serious borderline for danger. Which i also assume is the
apprehension of the main emphasis of the international society. Also what regards frames of sentencing.

   And General Sivil Penal Code § 222, first section:  
   "§ 222. Any person who by unlawful conduct or by any threat thereof compels another person to do, submit to, or omit to do anything, or who aids and abets thereto, shall be liable to fines or imprisonment for a term not exceeding three years. If there are especially aggravating circumstances, cf. section 232, third sentence, imprisonment for a term not exceeding 6 years may be imposed."

   And all this have relevance also to General Sivil Penal Code § 132a-a:  
   "§ 132a: 132 a. Any person who by means of violence, threats, damage or other unlawful conduct aimed at a participator in the administration of justice or any of his next-of-kin /  a) abehaves in such a way as is likely to influence the participator to perform or omit
to perform an act, task or service in connection with a criminal or civil case, or /  b) retaliates for any act, task or service which the participator has performed in connection with a criminal or civil case shall be liable to a penalty for obstruction of the administration of justice. // A participator in the administration of justice means any person who /  a) has reported a criminal matter or has brought an action in a civil case, /  b) has made a statement to the police or to the court, /  c) works or performs a service for the police, the prosecuting authority, the court or /  the correctional services, /  d) is a defence counsel, counsel for the aggrieved person or legal representative, or /  e) is considering the performance of such an act or the undertaking of such a task or such a service. // Any person who aids and abets such an offence shall be liable to the same penalty. / Obstruction of the administration of justice shall be punishable by imprisonment for a term not exceeding 5 years. If the act is committed under especially aggravating circumstances, a sentence of imprisonment for a term not exceeding 10 years may be imposed. In deciding whether especially aggravating circumstances subsist, particular importance shall be attached to whether the offence has endangered any person’s life or health, has been committed on more than one occasion, or by two or more persons jointly, or is of a systematic or organized nature. / Grossly negligent obstruction of the administration of justice shall be punishable by imprisonment for a term not exceeding 5 years."

   And Human Rights Act, Appendix 2, ECHR, Article 8 ((Menneskerettslovens Vedlegg 2, EMK, Art 8)):  
   "Right to respect for private and family life / 1. Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence. / 2. There shall be no interference by a public authority with the exercise of this right except such as is in accordance with the law and is necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security, public safety or the economic well-being of the country, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others."

   And Human Rights Act, Appendix 2, ECHR, Article 13 ((Menneskerettslovens Vedlegg 2, EMK, Art 13)):  
   "Right to an effective remedy / Everyone whose rights and freedoms as set forth in this Convention are violated shall have an effective remedy before a national authority notwithstanding that the violation has been committed by persons acting in an official capacity."

   And Human Rights Act, Appendix 2, ECHR, Article 14 ((Menneskerettslovens Vedlegg 2, EMK, Art 14)):  
   "Prohibition of discrimination / The enjoyment of the rights and freedoms set forth in this Convention shall be secured without discrimination on any ground such as sex, race, colour, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, association with a national minority, property, birth or other status."

   And Human Rights Act, Appendix 2, ECHR, Article 6 ((Menneskerettslovens Vedlegg 2, EMK, Art 6)):  
   "Right to a fair trial / 1. In the determination of his civil rights and obligations or of any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an independent and impartial tribunal established by law. Judgment shall be pronounced publicly but the press and public may be excluded from all or part of the trial in the interests of morals, public order or national security in a democratic society, where the interests of juveniles or the protection of the private life of the parties so require, or to the extent strictly necessary in the opinion of the court in special circumstances where publicity would prejudice the interests of justice. / 2. Everyone charged with a criminal offence shall be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law. / 3. Everyone charged with a criminal offence has the following minimum rights: / a. to be informed promptly, in a language which he understands and in detail, of the nature and cause of the accusation against him;  / b. to have adequate time and facilities for the preparation of his defence;  / c. to defend himself in person or through legal assistance of his own choosing or, if he has not a sufficient means to pay for legal assistance, to be given it free when the interests of justice so require;  / d. to examine or have examined witnesses against him and to obtain the attendance and examination of witnesses on his behalf under the same conditions as witnesses against him;  / e. to have the free assistance of an interpreter if he cannot understand or speak the language used in court."

   And Human Rights Act, Appendix 2, ECHR, Article 5 ((Menneskerettslovens Vedlegg 2, EMK, Art 5)) (emphasizing made by me):
   "Right to liberty and security", Point 1:
   "1. Everyone has the right to liberty and security of person. No one shall be deprived of his liberty save in the following cases and in accordance with a procedure prescribed by law:
     a. the lawful detention of a person after conviction by a competent court; 
     b. the lawful arrest or detention of a person for non-compliance with the lawful order of a court or in order to secure the fulfilment of any obligation prescribed by law; 
     c. the lawful arrest or detention of a person effected for the purpose of bringing him before the competent legal authority on reasonable suspicion of having committed an offence or when it is reasonably considered necessary to prevent his committing an offence or fleeing after having done so; 
     d. the detention of a minor by lawful order for the purpose of educational supervision or his lawful detention for the purpose of bringing him before the competent legal authority; 
     e. the lawful detention of persons for the prevention of the spreading of infectious diseases, of persons of unsound mind, alcoholics or drug addicts or vagrants; 
     f. the lawful arrest or detention of a person to prevent his effecting an unauthorised entry into the country or of a person against whom action is being taken with a view to deportation or extradition."

   And Human Rights Act, Appendix 2, ECHR, Protocol 4, Art 2 ((Menneskerettslovens Vedlegg 2, EMK, Protokoll 4 Art 2)):  
   "Freedom of movement / 1. Everyone lawfully within the territory of a State shall, within that territory, have the right to liberty of movement and freedom to choose his residence. / 2. Everyone shall be free to leave any country, including his own. / 3. No restrictions shall be placed on the exercise of these rights other than such as are in accordance with law and are necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security or public safety, for the maintenance of ordre public, for the prevention of crime, for the protection of health or morals, or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others. / 4. The rights set forth in paragraph 1 may also be subject, in particular areas, to restrictions imposed in accordance with law and justified by the public interest in a democratic society."

   Norwegian Constitution § 102, as simply and unequivocally says:
   "House-inquisitions must not be done,
except in criminal events." Period.

   And further for the matter:
   European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) and the rest of The Human Rights Act ( external ) are actually very well anchored in Norway. Both The Norwegian Constitution § 110c and the Human Rights Act, § 3, are and shall be a solid confirmation of this.
   Constitution with its § 110c has defined by law following: "It is the responsibility of the authorities of the State to respect and ensure the human rights."
   And § 3 of the Human Rights Act has law defined that the statutory of Human Rights Act "should prevail when conflicting provisions in other legislation".

---

   
Criminal representatives norwegian official authorities have made it their task to terminate the undersigned, Rune L. Hansen.
   I'm in that sense only one of their many victims. And a separate case-complex in this respect.

   They do this by terror, harassment and torture. Their special tool in this respect are representatives of the public, municipal so-called childcare services who produce and write and manipulate false documentation for this purpose.
   The false documentation and its purpose further then is being automatically uncritical whitewashed. This means continued and added with more.

   Of the criminals concerned representatives of the Norwegian authorities and their co-players. A well-lubricated "machinery" and network for child-robbery industry and criminal political agenda in Norway.

   They produce and transmit false documentation using lies, threats, staging and awards.
   Both the judiciary, police and many are in different ways and to different degrees involved in this. From top to bottom in public and at the grassroots.

   Let me in connection with this, say these words:
   Me and Trudy (their mother) had the world's finest, finest and most talented, healthy, happy children and a cohesion and a well-being, security, peace and tranquility and a view of development that surpasses most. We lived with our children in a safe and well func family. Up close and dear and to everyone's joy and satisfaction in all years. All of our children and our whole family was very legitimate and bragged and praised by all and everyone. Never anything else. In all ways always successful children throughout his life living at home with father and mother in the well-being, with the father as the main responsible for the daily care and maintenance, always serving and present. Always happy, talent-filled, healthy, safe, reliable, robust, knowledgeable, energetic, polite, decent, kind and in every way successful children, each of them and they all. And always a pleasure and very good and praised experience for other people and families. Wherever we came.

   In relation to this, a man and say it to me and my family are entitled to use the Child care Act (external) § 4-6, 2 joints, where it is said that:
   "Is there a risk that a child is significantly harmed by staying in the home, the child care administration's leader or the prosecutor without the consent of the parents immediately take a temporary decision to place the child outside the home."
   All Child care Act § 4-12, 1 subparagraph d, where it is said the following:
   "A decision to take over the care of a child can be taken d) if it is highly likely that the child's health or development can be seriously injured because their parents are unable to take adequate responsibility for the child."

   The man who came and said this was called and called Irene K. Hebnes, head of the municipal child care and social service in Vindafjord.
   And she wanted me to certain reasons evil. Therefore, produced and recorded her statements about me and my family, statements intended to convince others about the justification of the use of these statutory sections.
   
   She claimed that the father, the undersigned, are mentally ill and dangerous care skills for the children and is paranoid with respect to all of the Norwegian government and public administration, and is violent and oppressive and isolating himself and his family and the children have unsatisfactory home school. And that the father's writings (documentation) is a testimony that the father is mentally ill. Nothing was or is true.
   But this was what she claimed, and would by using threats and staging for others to say.
   In order to deprive me by depriving me all the children and the lifes rightt. Which she did, in a crime that is now complete. In a crime that is comparable with a multiple murder and worse.
   Absolutely the worst sort child abuse is to separate a child from his father and / or mother. And from their integrity. Which is also the worst abuse a black man, a father and / or a mother may suffer. A father or mother derived the lifes rightt. It's like a kind flerefoldig death sentence, and may be worse than that. By itself built torture and accessories. It is absolutely the worst and most grotesque punishment a human can be exposed to.

   A well-functioning, strong and confident father and family. Up to 13 March 2006 (external) as Irene K. Hebnes, director of child care and social service in Vindafjord, and her co-players forced their way into our family with a crash of a cultural collision.
   There and then we were on the coarsest threatened and across harassed, in a ca. 95 minutes long meeting in Vikedal. Our oldest son, Balder (then 20 years), was blown apart by harassment. And afterward by him and those with the deadly threats also Trude, in stages of fear and terror, and gradually. Then also through temptation and alluring. Schism in and for the family as a grotesque wedge began to appear. And neither Balder or Trudy was able to have perspective or peace of mind in relation to it. The fear, threats and harassment drove Trude into despair. And Balder into the mind of confusion, selfishness and pride. No less then terrorism, harassment and threats of further attacks worse and worse. And characterized by torture became stronger and stronger.
   When Trudy 03 April 2008 kidnapped all of our children and held prisoner gagged and they had the course in stages gotten worse and worse in terms of threats, torture and despair. And this was a new and unimaginable climax for us all. But in the very different and various ways for the family as a prisoner held and gagged children. In order to "save the children from Irene K. Hebnes and child care." After 03 April 2008 was more extreme and continuous terror, harassment and torture across from me and the children.
   
   It started foråret 2006 by Irene K. Hebnes their attack with harassment and threats, and continue with her false documentation and terrorist. She threatened and planned to take the children away from me, their father, and she has now with his fellow players definitely made, so she threatened, and so she laid a plan with false documentation. Her plan and the bulk of her false documentation stated her case presentations for county board in Rogaland dated 13.12. 2007 (external). It contains just assumptions, distortions and harassment and a bunch of lies, she repeats over and over again in more or less variation in shape. And her battle plan and purpose. How-to do nothing Rune L. Hansen, father of the children. She knew even then approximate whom she had as their players and with whom she continues to expect that his fellow players. And that is how. Both its network, its power and its methods.
   The county boards of social affairs is the long arm of child care and undermines children's and parents' legal rights. This is because the county boards relate to child care hypotheses and assertions that undeniable truth, and treat them as enforceable domsavsigeleser. In 9 cases out of 10 wins out of the county child care boards, without imposing critical questions about child care methods or conclusions. Positive information and witness statements about their parents rarely or never considered by the county boards, and therefore most of the cases that promote child care, in reality, the Tribunal decided in advance.

   And it was mainly quite as she planned and expected. Both the police, the county committee and the court, and several took on criminals show her the document, will and purpose so that truth and right and proper. They whitewashed it, påplusset harassment and injustice, to carry out its purpose. Via to maintain and continue the kidnapping, capture content and Gagging of the children, plus various criminal accessories. Neither I nor the children in question was taken seriously or estimated. Nor does the majority of witnesses, arguments and evidence.
   And the so-called legal parental responsibility and care responsibility they operate with manipulating them with to achieve its intended purpose. While the concept of child is turned over to the child's worst.

   I refer in these contexts also among other crimes against the Penal Code section 110:
   "§ 110: A Judge, a lagrettemedlem or discretion of a member, where as such, all mod better Vidende, punishable by Fængsel until 5 Aar. / Has he thereby brought about or contributed to, that some wrongly fældes in Straf or greater Straf end deserved punishment he Fængsel for at least 2 Aar. / Is at Grund of crime Dødsstraf fuldbyrdet or Frihedsstraf udstaaet for more than five years, Fængsel up to 21 years imposed. "

   Last now, came from Haugaland District Court in a verdict dated 08.12. 2010 by Judge Per Annstein Aarvik (Case No. 10-167860TVI-HAUG) in the form of further harassment following unequivocal message: Rune L. Hansen and his children will never ever more to be or become a father and child in relation to each other or ever more contact with each other and can not appeal this decision.

   It can make it difficult to write about all this without spending a whole range of negatively charged words.
   Anything and everything a grotesque heretic process continuously packed with terror, harassment, blackening, violations, threats, torture, plunder, discrimination and oppression. Under the auspices of representatives of the Norwegian government and administration. An intense continuous ongoing spissrot-time for victim is the approximate or even impossible to relate to without adequate health, life values, home and everything destroyed and perish.
   A process in which the victim while harassed economic, across isolated, stigmatized, exhausted and disproved. And derevives the lifes right. Any and all intended to-do nothing else.
   Concomitant with the judicial process on the basis of the criminal evidence dated 13.12. 2007 from Irene K. Hebnes, with wild allegations, lies, distortion and harassment, which automatically and uncritically continued and påplusses same suit in paragraph after paragraph, without substance or basis in truth or facts, without contradiction and without any real evidence or argument! With both claims without real substance and without adequate relevance. With largely bypass the full contents and concealment of evidence, arguments and witnesses. Only with discrimination, harassment, manipulation and terror. Not gross negligence or ignorance, but harassment and terror. A legal process packed with page also ongoing criminal insanity and staging. Where both I and the children abused in the grossest.

   They have ravaged us and abused us, and they have deprived me of my children and the lifes right and they deprived my children of their father, their integrity, home, school, identity, heritage, values, etc.
   I still light up after a clear explanation of the evidence and reasoning. Because I also know that such things do not exist and that claims that such things are mildly strong possible disprove. And I expect and demand that this should be done in full transparency and public disclosure. Some legitimate reasons are simply not.

   All this I have both audio recording and thorough documentation that proves iøvrig.

   All this I have both audio recording and thorough documentation that proves iøvrig. And several thousand pages, I have during this horror nightmare had to write down and write to document, and also relate to time limits, priorities, kidnappings, catch hold, threats, etc. Iøvrig, just to keep track of legal documentation such as floods over one and keeping it updated has been and is in itself a great extent impossible to work for a single person.

   Former Irene K. Hebnes produced as mentioned the false documentation dated 13.12. 2007 to the county board of Stavanger, with the claim and instructions and that the father, Rune L. Hansen, is mentally ill and paranoid in relation to all of the Norwegian government and public administration, and is violent and oppressive and isolating himself and his family and that children have unsatisfactory school at home. And that the father's writings (documentation) is a testimony to this. Both the father's writings and witness utsagt she presented to obtain by means of threats, staging and lies.
   While she was in the same document makes it clear that the mother (Trudy) must kidnap, capture and keep the gag kids may thereby be "alone-mother" for the way to "save the children". Which she also get our oldest son Balder (then 20 years) and mother's attorney and more to believe in "to save the children".

   Mother tries several times along the way to tell the truth, but is not estimated, which is not evidence and witnesses will be. And opposed even by his own lawyer, who threaten and harass both her and the children. Just as when both the children and mother protesting more loudly in September and October 2008. Among other things, and especially in some type of Haugaland District Court. Mother are then told by the child care service in Haugesund (which is directed by Irene K. Hebnes) and her lawyer that if she does not deny the contents of the vein to the writer Haugaland District Court then sent the children in foster care / orphanages. Mother's only choice to avoid this will be to assert that the father has left them and threatened to kill her unless she signed and submitted them. 15. or 16 October 2008 and the days afterward the mother decides to say this in conversation and the rest of the kidnap gang and says so. Immediately afterward, 21 October 2008 is the father sat in the smooth cell at the police station and from there transported to jail Åna at Stavanger, where he along with the convicts sitting in prison custody, and isolated in nearly 5 months. And in court without the slightest evidence or any witness be punished for this, when the evidence and witnesses to what really happened hushed up and gagged. The undersigned, the father, has good documentation, audio recordings and witness statements about what really happened, even with respect. what really happened in court. Among many other things a complete audio recording in good quality of the entire trial in Gulating Appeal. Where the false documentation from Irene K. Hebnes prevailed.

   This and this criminal madness of the prevailing conditions in the public sector in Norway during these times.

   Irene K. Hebnes their false documentation submitted to the county board, court, police, etc., and get absolutely anything of criminal insanity to happen. This their false documentation, she has actively, directly and indirectly, used and manipulated by the police, the municipal Terje Egil Kleven (in Vindafjord) Haugaland hospital (in Haugesund, Norway), Kirsten Westlye psychiatrist (in Stavanger), the municipal child care service in Grue , child-guard in Hordaland, the county board (in Stavanger), right, NAV and others.

   And the so-called child care services (in Haugesund) writes for example in a petition dated 23.02. 2010 they by his attorney Kari Nesse has sent the county board of Stavanger (external), without shame, constantly lie in the form of new and continuing claims, the following:

   "Child care Service has assessed that the conditions for the acquisition of care is present, cf BVL § 4-12, subsection 1 d. It is submitted that it is highly likely that children's health or development can be seriously injured because the mother is unable to take adequate responsibility for the children. Father has through his actions demonstrated that he does not respect the mother has custody of the children. He has threatened to kill the mother if she does not align himself to his wishes. Father has serious psychological problems, and child care consider it highly probable that he will continue to influence the children to come unto him. It is submitted that the father has a distorted perception of reality, as he constantly communicates to the children. This means that children do father's sense of reality to her. It is submitted that there is a great risk that the children are drawn into the father's paranoid world. Children are already marked by his father virkelighetsoppfaning and distrust of society and government agencies in particular, including schools, courts, child care, police and health care. / It is submitted that the mother will not be able to protect children against the father's indoctrination and courage that they go to Dad. Assistance also can not prevent this. child care services therefore consider it necessary that the children placed in foster homes to ensure they are handled in such a way that they come into a lasting positive development. It is submitted that it would be best for the children to be placed in the same foster home. "

   The section has a number of typical formulations in this respect.
   Complete lies and distortion in the form of statements adapted its purpose in relation to the relevant statutory sections.
   And full bypass of contents of over-general law and order.

   The consequences of a false "child" and false "alone-mothers" and criminals in the judiciary and the administration is in and of Norway is a disaster. Not least for the children. Both are both illegal and punishable. What one does with it and those who do evil and injustice are described and determined in our laws. Therefore, so important that not enforce our criminal laws.
   The very fact that criminals directly or indirectly enforce the law entails and helps more and worse than anything else to kriminaltet, evil, injustice, insecurity, oppression, and wronged in a society.

   Very many families and people, both children and parents, has been and is even completely destroyed by the government and municipal-called child protection. Very many people, both children and parents, have probed committed both murder and suicide to put attention on the outrageous terrorist regime, to stop it. There is a large and extensive terrorist regime, a multi-billion dollar industry, and of criminal insanity, with child-robbery, human trafficking, kidnappings, house-inquisitions, catch hold, harassment, threats, Gagging and torture that pervades Norway, behind the scenes. The legal system, massemediaen and everything is almost saturated with it, and even participated in it.

   Absolutely nothing justifies the enormous wealth of criminal madness going on under the auspices of the so-called child care and its partners. Absolutely nothing.

   The documentation and solid evidence many of us sitting inside with surpasses any of the people's wildest fantasies with regard to terrorism, harassment and torture. So also with regard to the extent of it. Norway is steeped in it, behind the scenes and propaganda.
In Norway there are very many thousands of commission gross miscarriage of justice, not least but most of all in so-called child custody and so-called child care cases.

   Such has become so common that many do not bother or dare to care more, other than in relation to the particular profile cases in and of massemediaen, exception cases. To describe such exception cases for false imprisonment (or even better: "possible miscarriage of justice") makes it easier for the Norwegian terrorist regime to conceal and to minimize and explain away (away-defining, if such a means) and to pursue the many miscarriages of justice, that it is both criminal policy and many criminal money in. Many do not we speak and declare this and such, and not the least risky.

   The terms "child, care, interests and integrity" is used and turned over to the opposite of the child, family, humanity, society and law real meaning and understanding of the child. The abuse of the term after the child's discretion and wild guessing, mendacious claims by employees of the local public child care services. With false allegations of child's best interests and with false documentation and criminal claims and threats of care takeover. And with different kinds of criminal and grotesque infringement of privacy and family life.
   The child's best either is or should be a competition or a war where the child has the best. The child's best is that we relate to the rule of law - ie the Human Rights Act. What is the prevailing political ideology and its representatives, not least within the judiciary, in Norway and most people have not at all do.
   The best interests of the child has been the worst, worse and worse, both despite and because of the "counter-measures" under the auspices of representatives of public and political.
    It is a political and hence public intentional discrimination, terror and lack of equality, which among other things, and especially the causes and stimuerer a kind of behind the scenes and facades ongoing civil war between the sexes. Where kidnapping, capture and hold Gagging of children and separation and division prizes. Not least by the Norwegian social security system under the auspices of the NAV. A NAV otherwise economic discriminate and oppress large sections of the population.

   The Norwegia Laws has a comprehensive service legislation that ensures the right to treatment and various types of assistance for those who need it. In relation to children and their parents (guardians), must be adapted to help the needs of each family as a whole. It is unnatural to help children without also help parents who need it. Mon helps parents help their children and also by the whole family. A child who does not prioritize the resources to protect both children and parents as well as the biological principle, but rather use what they have the resources to fight and fabricated parents in the worst possible light, not about protecting the child's interests.

   To take children by force and coercion from parents is an abuse of both children and parents. Social Services Act, the Municipal Health Services Act, Mental Health Services Act, the Patients' Rights Act, Guardianship Act provides for a number of additional provisions which fully protect children and parents, without detention, abuse of power and other abuses in violation of basic human rights.

   The purpose of the public "child" is in reality neither the return of the children or contact or visitation with the children. The same in relation to grandparents, siblings and relatives. Among other things because child-robbery in the public sector has been and is a big money industry in Norway, with many actors involved and a plethora of criminal madness.

   Several thousand new children each year kidnapped, held captive, gagged and plundered by the "child care" in Norway on a national basis. In addition, perhaps just as many kidnapped, held captive, gagged and outplundered of its one parent, often in the management of child-robbery industry.

   The so-called public and municipal child care services is dominated largely by women, often of relatively young women with psychopathic traits and spoiled morality. One of the reasons for this disparity is among other things, that decent people who work there often and easily squeezed out by those with less conscientious and more psychopathy.
   Terror with lack of culture of subjective guessing and hypotheses without real foundation encourages often the reason there. Antipathy and black paint of the parents, along with a clear interpretation of "signs" and "signals" that someone "looks" - will be on the basis of so-called measures leading to dramatic consequences for the children, parents and their family.
   And skrull-old women believe themselves to have more right to have family and children than you and me, and to come and take our kids, catching hold and mistreat them and deny their father and mother, harass, torture and plundered us and refuse our integrity and the lifes right.
   Protected by a grotesque criminal ideology that will be the opposite of law and the opposite of the child, human, family and society. In terms of both psychopathy and child-robbery industry's money-suck.
 
   Many places where children can be captured and kept gagged, children are exposed to completely grotesque with harassment, threats and torture and indoctrination, while blackening, smigring, fixation and reward - that the criminals are trying to get kids on their side and in his image.
   An important aspect of this is that if and when the child has been kidnapped, held captive and gagged - the so-called child or one parent for a long time so strange to be done, outplundered and retrain child. In terms of integrity, heritage, life values and identity of the child as other, alien child, in a process that is different with respect. time-course from individual to individual. The enormous injustice and plunder will be in more and more impossible to repair or restore. Human Rights Court in Strasburg is as far as I understand it aware of this, but molbo country and terrorist regime in Norway molester yet also like that seen on the roughest kids, parents, society, law and right.
   What hurts the kids are under such conditions it is important that they be given real opportunity to tell about. No such possibility exists not in the least any time even today. And what children say and what they and iøvrig parents and others have the rights, really should have the legal protection is not taken into account by the criminals in public.
   Indoctrination also like sets. The criminals know this and are afraid that the Norwegian people to know about it, and catch hold, gag, threatens and harasses the kids and their parents are the worse.
   Another interesting and important matters in evidence, stated the following - Elin Brodin, 2010:
   "The child is usually related to both mother and father. So if we see this from the child's perspective: No matter who has the formal custody, not a child initially feel" kidnapped "when one parent takes it with him. But it will desperately miss the other parent. At any reversal child will miss the "kidnapper". / This is the desperate situations. A child can not choose between their parents. "

   The state is and will be in our people and the rule of law. When criminals managers think and do something different and opposite it is a terrorist regime. The municipal government called Child care and its partners in Norway is one of the terrorist regime aspects, its most central, is a terrorist regime in terror regime, ruled by terror regime.
   Without the criminals who terrorize us, punished they will continue.

   The police and government officials and management does not (naturally enough) has the expertise when it comes to children as it is.
   Competence in children has not the judges, nor psychologists, nor parents or grandparents nor the law.
   But some of those where "social workers" in the "child" playing with dolls when they were småunger, so they have only the full knowledge and control! Imaginative writers try themselves after the ability also to be. Real expertise neither do they or will they know what is.
   "Decision" calls the chapters of his long-reaching book. A curio of a book. The bulk of the contemporary heretic and witch-processes in Norway. False and evil-minded documentation. This his evidence given both psychologists and judges with more indiscriminate permission to continue and to påplusse and signing on. What all that great child-robbery industry in Norway expects and demands and cheering for and pay for, and pursued it for. And while their real expertise is completely absent, to say the least.
   The employees of the police and other government agencies have the expertise and commitment to accountability, the rule of law should one might expect, but this is not always.
   Rogaland Public Prosecutor's Office were at. e-mail 25.06. 2010 informed by me about this case complex, in a letter dated 24.06. 2010 with a brief perspective on the complex case (external): Case-view-per-20100624.html The answer I got that sense from Rogaland public prosecutors by Tormod Haugnes dated 09.07. 2010 (as and forms sent Haugaland and Sunnhordland police a copy of my request and his answer - "attachments to the case") is interesting: "As far as I can see your type relates to a case dismissed (11059001). I find no reason to comment on the individual details of the case - or surrounding conditions, nor the more general question as stated on page 3 of your typing. / When it comes to child custody issues - or questions regarding the care - is this outside the competence of the police and prosecuting authorities. " He writes (external): 20100709-from-Rogaland public prosecutors-to-RLH.html why he thought the case dropped, I know not. Shelving of the case was pr. e-mail was written properly appealed 27.05. 2010 through Haugaland and Sunnhordland Police (external): 20100527-Complaints-at-henleggelse.html And the appeal of shelving of the case has not yet been answered, and the case may well not be said to be shelved?
   
---

   For there to investigate a little closer to what the matter is all about, I will reproduce a
   excerpt from my diary notes from 15.08. 2010:

  "We have been and are very fond of the place here. The houses are small, few and old, but such things can be done with something, which stopped when we're four and a half years ago was exposed for the terrorist from a young girl, Irene K. Hebnes, head of the municipal so-called child care and social service, who said she will take us from the children if I disclose certain documents (which I published). Large landscape with its krink and hooks and climate. We were when we hithen bought and moved in August 2002 having bought one of the many many other places instead, among them for the same price of large farms with several large, new and fine houses and buildings, but chose in particular because of the landscape and climate in this place that was underway named vineyards. Moved from a basically pleasant place in the Scottish Highlands in the inner Namdalen, large houses but only 10 acres of the garden was too small for us. Landbrukssjefen here where we said afterward bought our license application was the finest he has ever seen. Head said (then) when we asked, that we could safely buy and move hithen, that our home school is problematic. It did, however, different because of a perverse young girl with almost imperial omnipotence in Norway 13.12. 2007 finished making his Heksebok where they among other things is that I absolutely absolutely no care agency, for children, the mentally ill, and is violent and oppressive and is opposed to all authorities and Old Testament authoritarian and religiously spoiled, etc. in the wild, imaginative ways. And that only hope that not our children should be put in foster homes and orphanages is that the mother of kidnap and capture keeps kids and deny their children and themselves any contact with his spouse, the children's father. A lawyer (attorney Trond Hjelde) in Haugesund and mother of my wife said that the only way to escape the threat was to do as he Iren K. Hebnes in the so-called child care service instructed.
   So I got here said a few words about it too. Just perennials and I am now at home. My wife, I have not talked to in two years time, the five youngest children almost not even in two years time. Neither the police, shame on-board, the courts, lawyers or any have even been able to help us, and everything and it all has constant for four and a half years now been a constant terror, harassment, blackening, violations, threats and torture. And all the kids all the way wanted nothing more than back home, while my wife surrendered completely to the said Irene K. Hebnes. I'm in these days ahead now in the process of having to see the enormous crime of enforced and perhaps in this case, acknowledge that they still held captive no more children are my children, but the alien's child. Fighting in tears and pain persistently and intensely opposed. However, the peace of mind. Does my family and I share the fate with many many others, and do what I can for everyone else and you and for our society and the basic common human values, protection, rights, responsibilities and obligations. "

   And this follows
   excerpt from my diary notes 25.12. 2010:

   "The experience yesterday - in relation to me and our family is concerned - was alarming and further contributes to the image and memory of Norway infected by ignorance and crime, made a worse and be a terrorist regime. Black-clad, uniformed police, three of those, plus two female also illuminate ignorance and complete lack of ability to see or understand what they were actually doing in civilian clothes. It is that sort of thing the daily doing, just as normal and natural as a trip into a store to buy groceries or go into an office to deliver a letter or some products. They neither see nor understand that the victims experienced it all completely different and opposite, abilities not to see themselves and what they do in perspective, objectivity or humanity. And believe in all his foolishness that when they exhibit such an attitude and behavior that it seems as soothing and reassuring to the victim, as the more violated, confused, frightened and injured. It's all incredibly macabre - and perverted.
   Even the simplest and most precise of the statutory provisions reviewed past and forgotten in the most grotesque of people who believe themselves to have a purpose, as in a sort of trance and SIN fixation on purpose - but not either legal or statutory purpose.
   Such as Norwegian Constitution § 102, which is simply and unequivocally says, "House Inkvisitioner Do not Exist, without a criminal EVENT." Period. Or the Constitution § 110c: "It is incumbent upon the Government Honours The authorities that respect and ensure Menneskerettighederne." Fixated, as in trance, like crazy, hiking and tramping the back and trample over children, family, individuals and everything in its path! And look at all not what they are doing or are doing.
   5. time house-inquisition now (internal). And perennials kidnapped about. 9. time (internal).
   This time on Christmas Eve.
   Norway has become a dangerous country to live in.
   There are nowadays many more than those black-clad Santas who are of the opinion that the law is nothing to worry about.
   Which is not my opinion.
   I stick to good to be criminal or obscene.
   It is also what I always taught my children. "

   And this follows
   excerpt from my diary notes 10.08. 2010:

   "Employees of bv with 3-year-school social worker (with studies in Bible and Kari Killen like gaudy print from the Labor Party ideology) after school has in practice received the highest competence as a doctor, psychiatrist, over-the police, the teacher, the highest -Supreme Court judge, high-quality father and mother, grandparents and relatives, control authority, royal truth supplier, money manager, Emperor of the municipal administration and the mass media and iøvrig, security service jurisdiction, investigation commission, efterretnings service, the royal executioner, torturer, inquisition, etc, etc.
   They instruct and direct, in practice, one and all and whatever, and your diploma task is to remove any human, as well as clear conscience, wisdom, sense, decency, justice, etc., etc.
   There is thus no different or unexpected in this present case. Apart from that the whole thing from beginning to end is lavishly strenuously thoroughly documented and safeguarded. The letters, court documents, audio recordings, etc. from first to last - in this case as a whole has almost been written.
   I went to a genuine and in all ways very highly respected and experienced psychiatrist to hear what he had to say about me as a person and in this case complex. Dr. Hans Olav Tungesvik in Skånevik Etne municipality, a specialist in psychiatry. He wrote, among other things, the way both an assessment and a statement (external), where it clearly stated that I am neither mentally ill or anything wrong, but on the contrary, praising and reassuring words for all manner of speaking,. These, both assessment and declaration and more, was performed both for the police, children mill service, county commission, judicial bodies and more people, but who cares about such things when a pervert young girl named Irene K. Hebnes, head of the municipal social services and child care services in our municipality Vindafjord, say and write in a write inquisition dated 13.12. 2007 (addressed to the County Committee of Rogaland), among other things, that I'm crazy, violent, oppressive and absolutely no any care abilities have for children? Say and write this and this after already when the grossest, and incredible uhyrligste to have threatened, harassed and terrorized us towards two years.
   Her diagnosis and case presentation and input exceeds the freest imagination and reality-flight, but the words of everyone who represents the authority of government completely uncritically and automatically assumed that truth and sacred - so sacred that the most solid evidence, witnesses and documentation and the law not be estimated, but on the contrary denied, hushed and distorted and has an apparent non-existence.
   Anything and everything so completely opposite child protection, family protection, human rights protection and justice that at all possible, to the monstrous far into the perverse.
   I reckon we are with this case has an overwhelmingly good case for human rights court (EMS) in Strasburg, and more. But at least this country is even terrorist regime that prevails, and that has to go. "

   And this follows
   Rune L. Hansen, 201,012-note-001:

   "In 15 years, only in so-called child care issues 121,000 children separated from their parents, and just this year about 8,000 children. How many people in addition to the so-called child custody cases? All figures in the dark?
   The numbers are quite incredible and include soaring and representrer a national disaster of criminal madness most affected by and who even tried being suppressed by the criminals.
   Times the number of kidnapped and held captive as children in Norway. years with the number of parents and grandparents (plus any other relations) - then see a number of new people each year are directly affected in the form of tragedy of this worst sort of crimes against children!
   Iøvrig: 46 500 children and adolescents in Norway received the so-called "measures" from the "child" in 2009. What percentage of these "measures" which is really about harassment and threats, says nothing about statistics. Anybody have some more relevant statistics to add or to comment on?
   The figures are completely incomprehensible matter and comprises soaring and representrer a national disaster of criminal madness most affected by and who even tried being suppressed by the criminals.
   Such assigned in all the - that child-robbery, kidnapping and catch hold of the child to "pay" for most.
   When children and people from stranger made his integrity, his parents and his hometown is done at the same time more of the objects.
   To the objects and the wild ways.

   Nearby everyone in Norway is to make money from kidnapping, catch hold, gagging and out-plunder of children.
   It is as in Norway and certain other countries, intentional and assigned.

   Each of those who do with making career-offender, acceptance and money on it. Some of the server also only or simultaneous expiration of his psychopathy and politics. Vicious circles and spirals of fear, intimidation, fixation and prizes that spread in the population, as indoctrination, oppression and terror. With false documents and propaganda.
   While television mafia and politics ravaging. Intentional, deliberate and assigned to the key persons as representatives of public and political. Single people who abuse and exceed their power and authority.
   With disastrous consequences for our whole society and all.

   And the police and the justice system and more allows the public and municipal-called "child care" rather be completely released in relation to and above the law, which of course is neither legal or understandable. But simply involves grotesque conditions and terror, the unfathomable dimensions.
   And therefore, the closest being taboo, and somehow dangerous and that is serious enough "forbidden" to talk or write about this and such!

   A bit of something to the situation and conditions! Say the least! Heart Loose, false, selfish, arrogant, deceitful, greedy - and worse and worse as grotesque illiterate in law and human rights and protection! Without integrity, legal protection, contradiction or menneskverd, largely made objects. Replacement items, to be disposable.

   Employees of bv with 3-year-school social worker (with studies in the Bible of Kari Killen like gaudy print from the Labor Party ideology) after school has in practice received the highest competence as a doctor, psychiatrist, over-the police, the teacher, the highest- Supreme Court judge, high-quality father and mother, grandparents and relatives, control authority, royal truth supplier, money manager, Emperor of the municipal administration and the mass media and iøvrig, security service jurisdiction, investigation commission, efterretnings- service, the royal executioner, torturer, inquisition, etc, etc.
   They instruct and direct, in practice, one and all and whatever, and your diploma task is to remove any human, as well as clear conscience, wisdom, sense, decency, justice, etc., etc.
  Children out-plundered and stripped of life's most important common human values, protection and rights. Parents just so and lifes right. During the years-long procedures and processes of intense terror, harassment and torture. What country are we living in?!

   By Geir H. A., 21.12. 2008 says, among other things:
   Should the child be placed?
   http://mjosby.no/-/bulletin/show/200208_boer-barnevernet-legges-ned?ref=mst
   (...) We can no longer allow a child who shows up at the maternity clinics, kindergartens, schools or break into homes and taking children by force. Such a child has long since outlived its role and lacks all credibility. There are too many examples of child care abuse, ignorance and abuse of power which has destroyed both children, parents and their families. Therefore, it encourages a widespread perception among most people that the child "take children" from parents. (...) The use of force / use of force or coercion against children are not permitted, unless it is demonstrably committed abuse, violence exercised against the child or is in danger. Can it be documented severe substance abuse, mental illness or other conditions that are detrimental to the child, it must be inserted into the appropriate remedial action in relation to this. Anyone who is physically or mentally ill, drug addicts, or otherwise not functioning properly, is entitled to assistance. On equal footing with everyone else who needs it, also caregivers the right to home-based care or care, and if enforcement action is the only way out, they must only be applied to adults. / If a child because of circumstances described in the paragraph above must be placed with other caregivers for a shorter or longer time, the earliest possible clarified whether anyone in the child's family or others with whom the child knows and is familiar with can maintain custody of the child until the parents themselves can resume their caring mission. "

   Under the guise of false "child" and false "alone-mothers" is the number of child victims of such in Norway annually probably not far from 20 thousand children! And in addition, at least just as many parents. In addition, grandparents, etc. Every year!
   For criminals with morality and consciousness in very low level. Intentional, stimulated and assigned in an abundance of a terrorist regime, hidden behind the scenes, false documentation, manipulation of law and justice, propaganda and indoctrination.
   By criminals who have done child-robbery national industry # 1 in Norway, in an abundance of criminal insanity to far into the perverse.
   Children are kidnapped, held prisoner, gagged, harassed, tortured, out-plundered and mistreated iøvrig criss-cross, intended by the criminal members of the public! And parents, not less.
   And an attempt is indoctrinated that it is as it should be! And the grace of the protest, rebukes or say anything else! It is not long life right! Propaganda and the false documentation comes and takes it! Such objects have no right to exist!
   The private life should be destroyed, the most fundamental rights, privacy, freedom, property rights, the right to raise children without intervention from myndghetene, etc. gradually disappears. Such rights, we have only on paper.
   Human Protection and Child care in Norway?
   It's easy, comfortable and in some ways safer to deal with that matter and as if taboo in Norway. Risky to break this taboo, can even quickly easily be fatal. By pretending that nothing is quite simply the greatest chance to be left alone, at least in the short term.
   The terrorist regime mechanisms. Terror regime's social mechanisms. The greatest chance then that a self is not threatened and attacked.
   What they really are doing must be further presented to the public and will frighten, shock and shake every decent man that already, did not know or know!
   I either is or is similar to a criminal, and was therefore punished, tortured, killed and destroyed done. And my children made homeless and fatherless, as cut flowers, of the same criminal perverts.
   Deprived of life values and goals developed through a long life, and deprived of life's most important common human values, protection and rights and thus life straight. For all of us in a heretic process of monstrous criminal lunacy, constant terror, harassment, torture and out-plunder. "

---


   I demand and expect after the research and case processing, and I demand and expect the restoration and replacement. And that this must happen within a reasonable time, thoroughly, fairly and efficiently.

   Finally in this police-review write here I will include an aspect of the subject-specific complex that is about the employees of NAV his criminal involvement with this. I do this now, today at the same time to send you a copy of a letter I will forward the NAV Vindafjord Today: 20110103-to-NAV Vindafjord-from-RLH.html These words are included in this my same police report.



   With greeting from

   Rune L. Hansen,
   monday 03. january 2011, Tindeland.

---