-- 20110103E-til-NAV-Vindafjord-fra-RLH.html            --- BREVENE ( ekstern ) - NAV-brevene-index.html ( ekstern ) --- dbn.html  ( ekstern ) --- 
The translation of this document from Norwegian to English is perr 10.02. 2011 hasty done by Google Translator and is because og that not entirely completed yet! Still on the way.
((( norske original-versjon er på denne linken: 20110103-til-NAV-Vindafjord-fra-RLH.html ( intern ) )))
RLH: Sent (some late because of telephone closed) perr telefax 04.01. 2011, and perr e-mail: <nav.kundesenter.rogaland@nav.no>.


NAV Vindafjord,
Postboks 3,
5589 Sandeid.
Telefax: 52048711. 

Rune L. Hansen (født 06.12. 1955), tlf. 53 76 76 87,
5568 Vikebygd

5568 Vikebygd
                                                                          Date: Monday 03 January 2011, Tindeland.

Complaints regarding notification of the decision dated 20.12. 2010

   My letter to you dated 22.12. 2010 (external) has crossed their reply letter dated 20.12. 2010 (external). I refer to both of these letters.

   Discrepancy in these two letters with regard to the calculation for my life compared to actual revenues and expenditures as well as to law applicable in and for Vindafjord is great.
   Their response letter is a serious criminal bypass the contents of the current Norwegian law and the facts. This looked like nothing new from NAV his side since the kidnapping of my children 03 April 2008. Which NAV continuously and over and over again has been kept informed from my side.
   This has happened and happens in spite of the NAV and the NAV of the relevant Vindafjord are well informed about the facts.

   The NAV is related to me and my family and the case in question complex with false documentation, discrimination and harassment is an expression of serious criminals and life-threatening and life-damaging conditions.

   This has gone so far and is so severe that I now further clarify this to you and to other public authorities and agencies.
   While I require that employees of NAV and NAV Vindafjord speedily and optimally at once and immediately clean up and correct these conditions. Also with regard to extenuating circumstances, restitution and compensation.
   Waiver of responsibility or responsibility of confusion in this respect is not the way to go.

   I have the light of this evidence that employees in the NAV and NAV Vindafjord in relation to this and me and my family and others have made themselves guilty of serious crimes against human dignity and appropriate.
   These crimes is about crimes against the following over-arranged current Norwegian law provisions:

   Human Rights Act, Appendix 2, ECHR, Article 1:
   "Obligation to respect human rights / The High Contracting Parties shall secure to everyone within their jurisdiction the rights and freedoms set forth in Part I of this Convention."

   Human Rights Act, Appendix 2, ECHR, Article 3:
   "Prohibition of Torture / No one shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment."

   Torture-clause of the Norwegian Penal Code 11 chapter, § 110-126, on "crime in the public service" -
   Norwegian Penal Code § 117a:
   "Those who commit torture shall be punished by imprisonment of up to 15 years. The rough and severely tortured to death, imprisonment up to 21 years imposed. Complicity is punishable in the same way. / With torture meant that a public official causes injury to another person or severe physical or mental pain, / a) with intent to obtain information or a confession, / b) with intent to punish, threaten, or coerce someone, or / c) because of the person's religion, race, color, sex , homosexual orientation, lifestyle or orientation or national or ethnic origin. /
   With public official means of this provision any person / a) exercise public authority on behalf of the state or municipality, or / b) performs services or work as a state or municipality pursuant to law or regulation shall appoint someone to perform or partially or fully To pay for.
   It is also regarded as torture that the actions referred to in subsection committed by a person acting at the request or with the express or implied consent of a public official. / Added by Act of June 25, 2004 No. 52 "

   And Penal Code § 123:
   "Misuse a public Tjenestemand its position by undertaking or Undladelse of Service Action that krænke nogens Ret, punished him with stalls or the Service Tab or Fængsel until a Aar. / Has he acted for the lost coffee himself or others an unwarranted wrap, or by crime or significant damage caused Retskrænkelse forsætlig may Fængsel until 5 Aar imposed. "

   And Penal Code § 124:
   "A public Tjenestemand as unconstitutional circuit using his public position that persuaded or story that persuaded some that do, tolerate or undlade anything, be punished with stalls or the Service Tab."

   And Penal Code § 125:
   "A public Tjenestemand, where the parent or incite anyone to him in the public service, minor or his supervision during the dealer button Tjenestemand the crime himself in this service, or assisting him thereby or vidende charging him do it or who misuse their public position to urge a candidate public Tjenestemand to crime in the Service or to assist him in doing so, shall be punished according to the same penal provisions as this. / penalty is applicable without consideration to, the other at Tjenestemand Grund out of good faith or out of the second Grunde not strafskyldig. "

   False documentation-section of the Norwegian Penal Code 11 chapter, § 110-126, on "crime in the public service" -
   Penal Code § 120:
   "Have a public Tjenestemand in any service person Protocol indicated Usandhed or added Hide at Sand Avenue, or he has at Udfærdigelsen out Protokoludskrift, Telegram and Telephone Notification or by stamping, labeling or candidate officially Statement, which is afgiven that serve as evidence, stated or The certificate Usandhed Hide or added at Sand Avenue, punished him with the Service Tab or Fængsel until 3 years, but until six years, provided that he has acted in Hensigt that go coffee himself or others an unwarranted wrap or harm anyone. "

   And false-statement clauses in Norwegian Penal Code 11 chapter, § 110-126, on "crime in the public service" -
   Penal Code § 189 and 190:
   "§ 189 it, as in before using or udenlandske public documents or books or Lægeattester afgiver urigtig Statement angaaende some Begivenhed or Omstændighed, to which declaration is determined that afgive evidence, or as causing or contributing to, that such statement afgives be punished with stalls or Fængsel until 1 Aar, but until three years, provided that Hensigten has been the go coffee himself or others an unwarranted wrap or harm anyone.
   § 190 The, which has used that Heskey any such statement as in § 189 nævnt be punished just as therein provided. "

   And Penal Code § 215:
   "Whoever in the circuit unconstitutional Hensigt searches that unddrage a candidate on his site Family Stand or tilvende himself or a fake Family Stand, or as accessory thereto shall be punished with Fængsel until 6 Aar. In particularly extenuating Omstændigheder may booths used. / This provision applies not by the determination of paternity under the Children Act. "

   And Penal Code § 216:
   "With up to 3 years imprisonment imposed on anyone who brings about or contributes to a minor illegally withheld or be withheld from their parents or other person's care. / Under extenuating Omstændigheder booths can be used. / Public Prosecution Location finder alone after the petition of any offense."

   And in the Penal Code § 223 (a chapter of "crime mod the personal Friheden") is law-determined the following:
   "Those who illegally deprive a candidate Friheden or contributes to such Frihedsberøvelse, punishable by Fængsel until 5 Aar. / Has Frihedsberøvelsen safeguard over a month, or has it caused some uncommonly morbidity or significant injury to body or health, or caused nogens Death, imposed Fængsel for at least a Aar. / It included an alliance with someone to commit an act specified in subsection, shall be punished with imprisonment up to 10 years. "

   The 1 month of § 223 statutory provision is determined, is a serious serious danger threshold. Which I guess is the main bulk of the international community's perception. Also with regard to the criminal context.

   And Penal Code § 222, first paragraph:
   "With fines or imprisonment up to 3 years shall be imposed on, as in unlawful conduct or by threatening such force anyone to do, tolerate or undlate something, or accessory thereto. In particularly aggravating circumstances, see § 232, third sentence, the imprisonment up to 6 years may be imposed. "

   And all this is relevant also to Penal Code § 132a-a:
   "§ 132a: For counteracting the judiciary person who by violence, intimidation, vandalism or other unlawful conduct towards a player in the judiciary or any of his closest / a) act so that it is likely to influence the operator to make or omit a action, work or service in connection with a criminal or a civil case, or / b) repay an action, work or service that the actor has performed in connection with a criminal or civil proceedings. / / The player in the judiciary defined as / a) has filed a criminal offense, has requested the resumption of a criminal or is a party to a civil case, / b) has provided an explanation for the police, the court or the reopening of the Commission, / c) works or performs services for the police , prosecution, court, correctional and revision commission, jj / d) is the advocate, counsel or counsel, or / e) is considering making such an action or to undertake such work or such a service. / / Complicity is punishable. / Obstructing the judiciary shall be punishable by imprisonment up to 5 years. Is the action carried out under particularly aggravating circumstances, imprisonment up to 10 years imposed. In determining whether there are particularly aggravating circumstances, should pay particular attention to whether the infringement has caused danger to someone's life or health is committed on several occasions or jointly by several persons, or has a systematic or organized feel. / Gross negligent counteracting the judiciary shall be punishable by imprisonment up to 5 years. "

   And the Human Rights Act, Appendix 2, ECHR, Art 8:
   "The right to respect for private and family life / 1 Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence. / 2 There shall be no interference by a public authority with the exercise of this right except such as is in accordance with the law and is necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security, public safety or the economic welfare, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, or for the protection of the rights and freedoms. "

   Human Rights Act, Appendix 2, ECHR, Art 13:
   "The right to an effective remedy / Everyone whose rights and freedoms set forth in this Convention are violated shall have an effective remedy before a national authority notwithstanding that the violation is committed by persons acting in an official capacity."

   Human Rights Act, Appendix 2, ECHR, Art 14:
   "Prohibition of discrimination / exercise of the rights and freedoms set forth in this Convention shall be secured without discrimination on any ground such as sex, race, color, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, association with a national minority, property, birth or other status. "

   Human Rights Act, Appendix 2, ECHR, Art 6:
   "The right to a fair trial / 1 In the determination of his civil rights and obligations or of any criminal charge against him, everyone has the right to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an independent and impartial tribunal established by law. The sentence will avsis public but the press and public may be excluded from all or part of the proceedings for reasons of morality, public order or national security in a democratic society, when the interests of youth or the parties private life requires it, or to the extent the opinion of the court strictly necessary in special circumstances where publicity would prejudice the interests of justice. / 2 Everyone charged with a criminal offense shall be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law. / 3 Everyone charged with a criminal offense shall have the following minimum rights : / a. To be informed promptly, in a language he understands and in detail, about the nature and cause of the accusation against him / b. To have adequate time and facilities to prepare his defense; / c. to defend himself in person or through legal assistance of his own choosing or, if he does not have sufficient funds to pay for legal assistance, to receive it free when required in the interests of justice; / d. to examine or have examined witnesses against him, and get attendance and examination of witnesses on his behalf under the same conditions as witnesses against him; / e. to have the free assistance of an interpreter if he can not understand or speak the language used in court. "

   Human Rights Act, Appendix 2, ECHR, Protocol 7, Article 5:
   "Equality between spouses: / Spouses to be in their mutual relations and in relation to their children have equal rights and responsibilities of a private law nature with regard to marriage, during marriage and in case of dissolution of marriage. This article shall not prevent States from take such measures as are necessary in the interests of the children. "

   Human Rights Act, Annex 6, Article 23 Paragraph 4:
   "States Parties shall take appropriate measures to ensure the spouses equality of rights and responsibilities of marriage, during marriage and at its dissolution. In the event of dissolution of marriage, the children the necessary protection."

   Human Rights Act, Annex 4, Article 11, paragraph 1:
   "States Parties recognize the right of everyone to an adequate standard of living for himself and his family, including adequate food, clothing and housing, and to the continuous improvement of living conditions. States Parties shall take the necessary measures to ensure the realization of this right."

   And in keeping with this, the Social Services Act, § 1 (purpose of the Act determination) determined the following:
   "§ 1-1. Purpose. / The purpose of this Act is
   a) To promote economic and social security, to improve living conditions for disadvantaged, to contribute to greater equality and gender equality and prevent social problems,
   b) ensure that the individual has the opportunity to live independently and to have an active and meaningful life in community with others. "

  European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) and the rest of the Human Rights Act (external) are actually very well anchored in Norway. The Norwegian Constitution § 110c and the Human Rights Act, § 3, and will be a solid confirmation of this.
   Constitution with its § 110c has specific laws: "It is incumbent on the Government Honours The authorities that respect and ensure the Human rights."
   And § 3 of the Human Rights Act provides that the statutory Human Rights Act "should prevail when conflicting provisions in other legislation.

   With regards from

   Rune L. Hansen