-- 20110223E-til-NAV-Vindafjord-fra-RLH.html    --- BREVENE ( ekstern ) --- NAV-brevene-index.html ( ekstern ) --- dbn.html  ( ekstern ) --- 

The translation of this document from Norwegian to English is by the author 24.02. 2011.
((( The norwegian original-version of this document are to be find on this link:
20110223-til-NAV-Vindafjord-fra-RLH.html ( intern ) ))

RLH: Sent to NAV Vindafjord and Haugaland and Sunnhordland police-district perr fax 23.02. 2011.



NAV Vindafjord,
Postbox 3,
5589 Sandeid.
Telefax: 52048711.
-- With copy to: Haugaland and Sunnhordland policedistrict, filed police-number 11384062 and 11059001.

Rune L. Hansen (born 06.12. 1955), phone 53 76 76 87,
5568 Vikebygd
                                                                          Date: Wednesday, 23 February 2011, Tindeland.

   Again inquiry regarding NAV and Rune L. Hansen
   I have not yet received any response or reaction to my letter to NAV Vindafjord dated 07.02. 2011 ( external ). I refer to this my letter and to our prior written communication ( external ).

   You - ie NAV Vindafjord writes in letter of decision dated 20.12. 2010 ( external ) the following:
   "Rune Hansen has a disability-benefit which makes up about 28 800, - gross each month. From this it shall be withdrawn contribution of 8410, - and taxes of approx. 5600, -. In total, Rune Hansen then is being paid approx. 14 700, - each month. Of fixed expenses, Rune Hansen have house-rent around 1500, -,
electricity of approx. 1000, -, and in addition he shall have 5197, - to his own life survival.
   This make up to approx. 7700, - in current expenses each month.
   With a monthly payment of about 14 700, -, and 7700, - in current expenses, Rune shall then have 7000, - again each month. /
   Rune Hansen writes in the complaint that although that his income has increased because of repaid contributions debt, this is not enough. Nav Vindafjord is working with minimum-rates, and consider the circumstances regarding whether the individual has enough for the most necessary, current expenses.
   If 14 700 - is not enough monthly for Rune Hansen, Nav Vindafjord have taken the consideration from socialhelp-rates, where the conclusion is that Rune Hansen have sufficient to make the costs social-services are considering as necessary. In addition to this, Rune Hansen also some money left over each month. / In pursuant to The Social Services Act
, shall anyone who do not have opportunity to cover it self, got covered life-survival, house-rent and electricity."

   These your data and the letters other informations does not match what is stated in the facts you have been and are in possession of. For to keep order, I refer again to my overview and documentation of the facts stated in my letter dated 22.12. 2011 to NAV Vindafjord
( external ). From this I will here now refer the following:
   "As stated in the overview of my fixed expenses per. month (for year 2010) - without several important items (either house maintenance, car maintenance and use, savings, debt, unexpected expenses, etc.) and based on a very limited budget and life on emergency-flares and without possibility for further regular progress and which neither not take regardings to the particularly difficult conditions I and my family have been put in and neithet not the outplundering and the harassment that has taken place, as it has been in 2010 - gives a cost of kr. 16.386,- pr. month. / Shall one in this design include such items here in this writing given of fixed monthly expenses
on emergency-flares that not are filled will total my monthly expenses might be estimated around 25.000 kr. / I have no income other than my Social Security (disability pension), as like the conditions now are is much lower than this."

   It appears from this that your documentation is not correct. Also to mention here is that what I was getting paid by
Social Security for January 2011 was kr. 13.700, - and also for February 2011. Not 14.700, - kr.

   Is the reason for your lack of response the letter dated 21.01. 2011 from the County Governor of Rogaland, Health and Social Affairs ( external ), as you are familiar with?
   The letter from the County with a decision - which is final and can not be appealed, it says. And it is also says among other, that the County "reaffirm the municipalitys decision dated 20.12.2010, case-nr. 10/616" and that "the County does not give you pursuant to your complaint".

   In order to once again point out the mis-relationship between their calculation and mine I will refer to the following note I did 18.02. 2011:
   "From the Norwegian state through NAV arrived me today for this month (February 2011) kr. 13.700, - in social security payments. / And I have now in the day of today of those paid the most important of the regular monthly bills. It was like common during this time with even ongoing economic harassment towards me from NAV's side absolutely nothing left for the other bills or to groceries or anything. / I refer to my regularly updated Household budget ( external )."

   Above budget and otherwise facts, you are familiar with. And the difference to the allegations you are operating with are great.
   Just as I have pointed out which statutory provisions shall be and is current with respect. to the obligations of employees in NAV and NAV Vindafjord have. And have violated in relation to me. This I have especially made in my letter to NAV Vindafjord dated 03.01. 2011
( external ). Which I still neither not have received any feedback or response on.

   I wrote yesterday following note regarding these matters, which I reproduce here:
   Murderings and terminations via NAV

   Not di I get money for food and groceries and not neither to the others who is needed to live and to survive.
   I get so small that I only is given the choice of the order of the fatal clashes, or way to get killed.
   I am given the following choices:

   01: By to be without food and groceries.
   02: By to be without firewood and electricity.
   03: By to be without telephone- and Internet-connection.
   04: By to be without car, transportation- and travel-opportunities.
   05: By to be without home, via the housing-expenses.
   06: By not to pay the bills they unjustifiably give me.

   This they know and are intentional. It is also such they do killing and terminations.
   While they at the sam time cover over with false documentation.
   They have their key-persons and "useful idiots" to perform suchs.

   But can I not get me a job that I make money from then?
   To avoid having to try to live with the
social security insurance?
   I can not, for the following reasons:
   Because all my time and labor are going to the work withe the case-complex.
   And because I relate me in solidarity to others in the same or similar situation.
   Also otherwise in solidarity with all those who are unable to have paid work.
   I must also therefore do the documentation on what is happening, and also relate me to that.
   Not least for to be able to stop the injustice, murderings and terminations.
   I can neither down-prioritize this matter or respond with careless to it.
   I document how it is being done.
   Even how I myself is being tortured and terminated.
   The person or they who says I have a choice such are thinking wrong.
   And even though if I tried to choose different so it would not go much differently better.
   If I choosed differently it would be much worse for everyone, everyone and everything.
   I have no choice like that seen.
   Other than to relate me good and right to the whole.
   And I do of course.
   Anything else would also have been to be killed even faster.
   Simple and fair enough like that seen.
   Knowledge and insight into this who is ongoing obligates every human being.
   To to get stopped the criminal madness.
   For my part, it is also not least my own children I have to consider.
   But it consider also in relation to other humans and children.
   And in relation to all and any.
   Such of criminal madness neither must either shall should be able to continue.

   As is also evident from this, it is serious relations this all are about.

   I have received a letter from the Norwegian Road authorities that says that the licence plates for my car would be taken off if I not get in orden with the
European Union control of the car within February 2011. But how can I when I barely have money for petrol once, or to pay for such an EU-control? Thus, I therefore also are being without car, which I have used in the past 30 years time. And how will NAV defend this?
   Without the car, I could not even drive to or get me to the nearest grocery store to buy food and groceries. It is from home 13.1 kilometers round trip to the near-grocery (Vikebygd store). And 38.9 km round trip Skjold. And 99.6 km round trip Haugesund.

   If I around the New Year time had not gotten borrow money from my mother to pay the telephone- and internet-bill, I would now also have been without both telephone- and Internet-connection. And how will NAV defend this?

   Nor is my request to NAV Vindafjord regarding Statens Innkrevingssentral (the States Collection Agency) yet answered. And how will NAV defend this?

   And a whole lot more are not adequately or at all answered.

   The economic harassment from NAV's side have now been ongoing very long time and in different ways damaging and life-threatening. As evidental from all this that you have been and are updated and informed about. And herewith now even more.

   I made you aware of among others the following current statutory provision:

   Human Rights Act, Annex 4, Article 11, paragraph 1:
   "States Parties recognize the right of everyone to an adequate standard of living for himself and his family, including adequate food, clothing and housing, and to the continuous improvement of living conditions. States Parties shall take the necessary measures to ensure the realization of this right."

   And in concordance with this, the Social Services Act, § 1 (purpose of the Act determination) determined the following:
   "§ 1-1. Purpose. / The purpose of this Act is
   a) To promote economic and social security, to improve living conditions for disadvantaged, to contribute to greater equality and gender equality and prevent social problems,
   b) ensure that the individual has the opportunity to live independently and to have an active and meaningful life in community with others. "  
   Something similar is also stated in the Human Rights Act, Annex 4, Article 9:
   "The States Parties to the present Covenant recognize the right of everyone to social security, including social insurance."

   Furthermore, I would here further point on that not only the Penal Code prohibits the harassment and torture employees in NAV and NAV Vindafjord expose me to, but also the Human Rights Act, Appendix 2, ECHR, Article 3:
   "Prohibition of torture. No one shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment."

    And the Human Rights Act, Annex 6, Article 7:
   "No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. In particular, no one shall be subjected without his free consent to medical or scientific experimentation."

   And when now even the ongoing harassment from the NAV's side more and more critical threaten home and property with more and more acute is and are the relation also a crime against the Human Rights Act, Appendix 2, ECHR, Protocol 1, Article 1:
   "Protection of property. Every natural or legal person is entitled to the peaceful enjoyment of his possessions. No one shall be deprived of his possessions except in the public interest and subject to the conditions provided for by law and by the general principles of international law. / The preceding provisions shall not, however, in any way impair the right of a State to enforce such laws as it deems necessary to control the use of property in accordance with the general interest or to secure the payment of taxes or other contributions or penalties."

   At the same time, I will for the sake of clarity here now draw attention also to the following fact also valid statutory provisions:

   Human Rights Act Annex 4, Article 5, Sections 1 and 2:
   "1. Nothing in the present Covenant may be interpreted as implying for any State, group or person any right to engage in any activity or to perform any act aimed at the destruction of any of the rights or freedoms recognized herein, or at their limitation to a greater extent than is provided for in the present Covenant.
   2. No restriction upon or derogation from any of the fundamental human rights recognized or existing in any country in virtue of law, conventions, regulations or customs shall be admitted on the pretext that the present Covenant does not recognize such rights or that it recognizes them to a lesser extent."

   Human Rights Act, Annex 6, Article 2:
   "1. Each State Party to the present Covenant undertakes to respect and to ensure to all individuals within its territory and subject to its jurisdiction the rights recognized in the present Covenant, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status.
   2. Where not already provided for by existing legislative or other measures, each State Party to the present Covenant undertakes to take the necessary steps, in accordance with its constitutional processes and with the provisions of the present Covenant, to adopt such legislative or other measures as may be necessary to give effect to the rights recognized in the present Covenant.
   3. Each State Party to the present Covenant undertakes:
        a. to ensure that any person whose rights or freedoms as herein recognized are violated shall have an effective remedy, notwithstanding that the violation has been committed by persons acting in an official capacity; 
        b. to ensure that any person claiming such a remedy shall have his right thereto determined by competent judicial, administrative or legislative authorities, or by any other competent authority provided for by the legal system of the State, and to develop the possibilities of judicial remedy; 
        c. to ensure that the competent authorities shall enforce such remedies when granted."

    Human Rights Act, Annex 6, Article 5:
   "1. Nothing in the present Covenant may be interpreted as implying for any State, group or person any right to engage in any activity or perform any act aimed at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms recognized herein or at their limitation to a greater extent than is provided for in the present Covenant.
   2. There shall be no restriction upon or derogation from any of the fundamental human rights recognized or existing in any State Party to the present Covenant pursuant to law, conventions, regulations or custom on the pretext that the present Covenant does not recognize such rights or that it recognizes them to a lesser extent."

   Human Rights Act, Annex 6, Article 12, Paragraph 3:
   "3. The above-mentioned rights shall not be subject to any restrictions except those which are provided by law, are necessary to protect national security, public order (ordre public), public health or morals or the rights and freedoms of others, and are consistent with the other rights recognized in the present Covenant."

   With regards from

   Rune L. Hansen,
   23.02. 2011  (( + signature ))